Happy Ishtar? Inanna, Identity, and the Truth They Don’t Talk About
- 1 day ago
- 4 min read
By I AM ME Inc.

Happy Ishtar?!
Long before the resurrection story centered in Christianity, before Passover traditions were widely known outside of their origin, and before the rise of the Abrahamic religions, there was Inanna, later known as Ishtar. One of her most documented myths, preserved in ancient Sumerian texts like The Descent of Inanna, tells of her journey into the underworld where she is stripped of her power, judged, killed, and later resurrected. Scholars such as Samuel Noah Kramer and Diane Wolkstein have translated and analyzed these texts, noting the clear theme of death and return, a cycle often associated with seasonal change and renewal.
This story predates the resurrection narrative of Jesus by thousands of years and is tied symbolically to cycles of fertility and the changing seasons. Historians and comparative mythologists have long pointed out that many ancient cultures shared similar themes of death and rebirth, particularly around the spring equinox. However, while parallels exist, most scholars agree these are shared human themes rather than direct copies.
Still, the question remains. If these themes existed long before modern religion, what exactly are we continuing to celebrate, and what parts of the story have been left out?
To understand that, you have to understand Inanna beyond just the myth.
Inanna was not a one dimensional deity. According to Sumerian hymns such as The Exaltation of Inanna, she embodied love, sexuality, fertility, political power, and war all at once. Assyriologist Tikva Frymer Kensky describes her as a goddess of paradox, someone who held contradictions without needing to resolve them. She existed in complexity, and that complexity extended into the world built around her.
Her temples were not closeted spaces shaped by rigid patriarchal expectations. Archaeological and textual evidence suggests they were active cultural centers where ritual, performance, and identity intersected. Within these temples existed priestly roles such as the gala, kurgarru, and assinnu. These individuals are documented in cuneiform texts and have been studied by scholars like Julia Assante and Rivkah Harris, who note that their roles often involved expressions that blurred traditional gender distinctions.
Some gala priests, for example, performed lamentations in a dialect associated with women, and others were described in ways that suggest they operated outside conventional male identity. The kurgarru and assinnu are similarly referenced in ways that indicate non normative gender expression or roles that do not fit neatly into binary categories. While modern labels like LGBTQ+ did not exist, the presence of individuals living outside strict gender norms is clearly documented in the historical record.
There are also texts that attribute to Inanna the power to transform gender and status. In Sumerian hymns, she is described as a deity who can turn a man into a woman and a woman into a man. Whether interpreted literally, symbolically, or ritually, it reinforces her association with transformation and the breaking of boundaries.
Because of this, many in the modern LGBTQ+ community have looked back at Inanna and her temple culture as a point of connection. Not because ancient Mesopotamians used the same identity language we use today, but because the evidence shows that people who existed outside rigid gender roles were not only present, but integrated into spiritual systems. Historians caution against directly mapping modern identities onto ancient cultures, but they also acknowledge that gender and identity in Mesopotamia were more fluid and complex than often assumed.
This brings us to a deeper issue, one that goes beyond Inanna, Easter, or any single tradition. It is about how history is told. Over time, narratives are simplified, reshaped, and filtered through dominant cultural perspectives. As religions and societies evolve, elements that do not align with current norms are often minimized or erased. What remains is a version of history that feels digestible, but incomplete. History should be about understanding that new conversations are often reflections of much older realities.
Inanna’s story does not fit neatly into modern categories, and maybe that is the point. She represents a world where contradiction was not something to fix, but something to embody. Her temples created space for individuals who did not conform, not as outsiders, but as participants in something sacred.
So when people bring up Easter and Ishtar together, the truth is more layered than a slogan. Easter is not simply Ishtar renamed, but ancient Mesopotamian traditions surrounding Inanna do reveal that gender complexity, transformation, and nonconforming identities existed long before modern labels. Her story reminds us that what many see as new today has deep historical roots, and that human identity has always been more fluid and expansive than later narratives often acknowledge.
I hope you found value in our monthly educational blog, published on the first Monday of each month, which highlights the lives of LGBTQ+ individuals throughout history. Understanding history is crucial as it sheds light on our experiences, contributions, and the societal changes that are necessary. If you have a suggestion for a person to feature or wish to create an I Am Me History Blog, please reach out to Peirrce M. at peirrce@iammecorp.org.
Thank you for dedicating time to History!
Sources Cited
Samuel Noah Kramer and Diane Wolkstein, Inanna: Queen of Heaven and Earth: Her Stories and Hymns from Sumer
The Descent of Inanna, translated from Sumerian cuneiform texts, Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature, University of Oxford
Tikva Frymer-Kensky, In the Wake of the Goddesses: Women, Culture, and the Biblical Transformation of Pagan Myth
Julia Assante, scholarly works on gender and sexuality in ancient Mesopotamia
Rivkah Harris, Gender and Aging in Mesopotamia: The Gilgamesh Epic and Other Ancient Literature
Walter Burkert, Greek Religion
Tryggve Mettinger, The Riddle of Resurrection: Dying and Rising Gods in the Ancient Near East



Comments